A criminal justice reform bill has been introduced in the Senate. Importantly, Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley (R - Iowa) is a strong supporter along with a fairly large bipartisan group of Senators. So there is hope that the bill becomes actual law. Politico reports: Senators Unveil Bipartisan Criminal Justice Reform Package.
Here's some highlights:
Drug felons would have a reduced minimum mandatory sentence — 15 years instead of 20. This would be applied retroactively, after a court's review of the prisoner, as long as there is no past conviction of a violent felony.
Someone who has received "three strikes" and has been convicted of a drug felony would have a minimum mandatory sentence of 25 years instead of a life sentence.
Anyone who was not an importer, exporter, high-level distributor or supplier, wholesaler, manufacturer, or any participant in conspiracy are eligible for less than the 10-year mandatory minimum. Even those with up to four points on their criminal record could qualify for less than the minimum sentence where there are non-violent crimes.
The bill raises the maximum sentence from 20 to 25 years for those who commit interstate domestic violence which results in permanent disfigurement or life-threatening injury. The maximum would be increased from 10 to 15 years when serious bodily injury occurs or when a dangerous weapon is used. If death results, there would be with a 10-year minimum sentence.
Those who have been convicted of using a firearm during a violent crime or drug crime and have previously been convicted of the same offense would face a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years instead of 15, which could be applied retroactively.
The bill requires the DoJ to assess all federal inmates' risks of recidivism and assign them to proper programs, including work and education programs, drug rehabilitation, job training, and faith-based programs. Further details here.
My prediction on the case: the Supreme Court announces a very cumbersome, opaque rule to the effect that gerrymandering can rise to a constitutional violation that is so opaque that it is never violated.