A class action lawsuit in Chicago on behalf of some 60,000 men who have been returned to jail after being cleared of all charges:
« December 2015 | Main | February 2016 »
January 2016
January 29, 2016
January 25, 2016
Alabama Censures Judge Who Threatened Poor Defendants With Jail Unless They Gave Blood
The Alabama Court of the Judiciary has censured Circuit Judge Hon. Marvin Wiggins, who demanded that defendants too poor to pay their fines give blood or go to jail.
We discussed Judge Wiggins in an earlier post, Alabama Judge to Poor: Your Blood or Jail.
| | |
| | |
January 21, 2016
the Decline of Lawyers in Elected Office
The Washington Post reports on the decline of lawyers in public elected office, How the Most Disliked - And Elected - Profession Is Disappearing from Politics. Could it be that this is the explanation of the creeping dysfunction of the American political system?
| | |
| | |
the Decline of Lawyers in Elected Office
The Washington Post reports on the decline of lawyers in public elected office, How the Most Disliked - And Elected - Profession Is Disappearing from Politics. Could it be that this is the explanation of the creeping dysfunction of the American political system?
| | |
| | |
January 12, 2016
"the Roberts Court has found yet another way to stack the deck in favor of the rich"
Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank takes a dim view of the proceedings and oral argument in the public sector union case before the Supreme Court, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, The Roberts Court finds a new way to stack the deck in favor of the rich. The sum up:
The court’s conservative majority, setting aside a professed respect for precedent and states’ authority, is putting a thumb on the scale of justice in favor of the wealthy donors who have purchased the GOP and much of the government.
| | |
| | |
January 07, 2016
Qualified immunity and the Sad Case of DeShaney v Winnebago County Department of Social Services
Linda Greenhouse relates the sad denouement of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services on nytimes.com, The Supreme Court and a Life Barely Lived. DeShaney is a Supreme Court decision from 1989 granting complete immunity from damages to a county agency which had, beyond all reasonable explanation, placed a small child in a dangerous and abusive environment in which he sustained very debilitating injuries, injuries that prevented a decent chance at life.
Here is Ms. Greenhouse's fair description of the case:
Chief Justice Rehnquist’s opinion for the 6-3 majority took the narrowest possible view of the facts in holding that the county agency, despite its employees’ absolute knowledge of the threat that Randy DeShaney posed to his son’s welfare, breached no constitutional duty to Joshua. More than a year before the final beating, the boy was hospitalized with suspicious injuries, but a “child protection team” assigned to look into the situation quickly returned him to his father. Other emergency room visits followed. County social workers visited the home 20 times, taking notes but no action on occasions when the father said the boy was too sick to see them.
It is a decision that immunizes and insulates government from the type of accountability which does not seem at all unreasonable. The decision in DeShaney is somewhat defensible, because the liability claim is premised on a notion, at least to some degree, that government has a duty to provide minimal security and safety to its citizens including even to a small child. That can be an elastic standard, because the questions could be endless as to win such a duty commences and how far it extends.
Sharing with DeShaney the effect of immunizing government and government actors from the type of accountability that is not at all unreasonable are court decisions such as the Supreme Court's own decision two years ago in Lane v. Franks, which I discussed here, Lane v. Franks: Even Though It Would be A Crime, Supreme Court Rules that Public Employer Is Entitled to Qualified Immunity From Any Damages, and several by our own Sixth Circuit, which I have likewise discussed: Qualified Immunity and "Clearly Established" Constitutional Rights and "Happily" The Sixth Circuit Rules That American Citizens Have No Constitutional Protection Against Arbitrary Arrest and Jailing.
Robert L. Abell
www.RobertAbellLaw.com
| | |
| | |
Categories
- AAJ
- America
- American Association for Justice
- arbitration
- attorneys fees
- bad faith insurance practices
- class action
- Clean Water Act
- consumer fraud
- consumer protection
- consumer safety
- corporate accountability
- criminal justice
- drugs
- equal pay
- evidence
- expert witness
- fair pay
- family safety
- FDA
- federal courts
- First Amendment
- Food and Drug Administration
- food safety
- Fourth Amendment
- free speech
- Hartford Life
- health insurance
- highway safety
- HIPAA
- hospitals
- insurance claims handling
- insurance coverage
- judicial campaign contributions
- judicial elections
- justice system
- lawsuit procedures
- lawyer advertising
- legal education
- legal malpractice
- medical insurance
- medical malpractice
- mine safety
- mining safety
- miscellaneous shenanigans
- nursing homes
- pay discrimination
- peanut butter
- personal injury
- predatory lending
- preemption
- product recall
- public safety
- right to bear arms
- search & seizure
- Second Amendment
- sentencing guidelines
- sex discrimination
- Sixth Circuit
- Supreme Court
- tort reform
- toxic substances
- unsafe products
- workplace safety
- wrongful death