As I said earlier, forget greatness. The judges who adopt the pretense will be respected by many other judges and applauded by legislators, who don’t like the idea of judges making law, though judges to make a great deal of law.
There has never been enough good lawyers, although there definitely are too many not so good lawyers. The legal job market these last few years has not been good, expenses and tuition have continued to climb and many are concluding – quite reasonably in my estimation – that other fields on the whole offer better opportunities.
My own law school, Tulane, reports that it has reduced its incoming class size to the smallest since the early 70's while also substantially increasing the group's overall qualifications, i.e., higher GPA's and LSAT scores. Good.
The Wall Street Journal blog Pharmalot reports that 1/3 of the physicians and other experts sitting on FDA advisory panels reviewing medical devices from 2012 to 2014 have financial ties to the companies whose devices they are reviewing, see What Money? Financial Ties of FDA Device Advisers are Often Undisclosed. Nearly 10% of these experts were directly compensated by the specific companies whose products they were directly reviewing. Interestingly, the FDA disclosed only 1% of these financial ties.
One of the hardest things in the world is getting someone to understand whose paycheck is dependent upon them not understanding.
Here's the game: medical device companies capture the FDA by buying influence with these experts and secure FDA approval for their devices, which in turn serves as a defense to defective product lawsuits, often a complete defense. So at the front end it is possible for medical device manufacturers to buy their way out of any accountability or liability to individuals and families hurt be defective medical devices.
And so it goes. Remember money doesn't talk it swears.